Fun_People Archive
15 Nov
13 Myths about the Results of the 2000 Election

Content-Type: text/plain
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
From: Peter Langston <psl>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 100 09:48:26 -0800
To: Fun_People
Precedence: bulk
Subject: 13 Myths about the Results of the 2000 Election

X-Lib-of-Cong-ISSN: 1098-7649  -=[ Fun_People ]=-
X-http://www.langston.com/psl-bin/Fun_People.cgi
Forwarded-by: <Harlanquin@aol.com>

    13 Myths about the Results of the 2000 Election

    by Rich Cowan


In the next week, millions of dollars will be spent in a public relations
war in an attempt to determine the next president of the United States.
Will the outcome of the election be determined by ratings in the polls?
Will the present standoff be resolved by escalation and threats? Or will
the intention of the voters on election day, and the responsibility of the
states to count their ballots, actually be taken into account?

Our involvement in the next few weeks is essential to assert democratic
control over the election process. The price of liberty is eternal
vigilance.  This flyer is a collaboration of over a dozen people who have
been researching and documenting the truth. It provides a point by point
analysis of some key myths. Please read, copy, and forward to friends,
relatives and colleagues!
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

1) Myth: Al Gore has a responsibility to concede the election.

Fact: A 330 vote margin out of 6 million votes cast in Florida is incredibly
close!  It is roughly equivalent to a 1-vote margin in a city with 40,000
people and 18,000 voters.
[As of last night (11/14), it was a 300 vote margin, so make that 44,000  
people and 20,000 voters... -psl]

It is extremely rare for an election this close NOT to be contested for
several weeks until a manual recount can take place, with observers from
both sides taking part and inspecting ballots. This kind of detailed recount
has not yet taken place.

According to the US Constitution and the Laws of Florida, it is the
responsibility of officials in Florida to certify the election results.
November 17 is the deadline for absentee ballots sent from overseas to
arrive. Since the election is close enough in Florida, Oregon, and New
Mexico to be affected by absentee ballots, the results in those states
cannot be certified before that date.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

2) Myth: the number of "spoiled ballots" in Palm Beach County was typical.

In a press briefing televised live on all networks on 11/9/00, Karl Rove
of the Bush campaign compared the 14,872 invalidated ballots in the 1996
Presidential race to 19,120 ballots for President that were spoiled in this
election.

Fact: the Bush campaign was comparing apples and oranges. There were
actually 29,702 invalidated ballots this year in Palm Beach County. This
is almost twice the number in 1996. The number 19,120 refers to the ballots
that were thrown out for voting for two Presidential candidates. The
remaining 10,582 ballots had no choice recorded for President.

According to the Palm Beach County elections office (www.pbcelections.org),
voters this year were not confused at all by the rest of the ballot. For
example, less than 1% of U.S. Senate votes were invalidated because of
multiple punches, compared with over 4% in the Presidential contest.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

3) Myth: The Palm beach ballot is definitely illegal due to the presence
of punch holes to the left of some of the candidates.

Fact: According to the Secretary of State's office, there is a loophole in
Florida law that may allow ballots used for voting machines to deviate from
the rules governing paper ballots. This view has been contested by hundreds
of Florida voters. The final decision on the legality of the ballot is
likely to be made in court, as long as this issue could have an effect on
the election.

It is possible that the ballot could be ruled illegal on other grounds,
such as the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act or
the Americans With Disabilities Act.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

4) Myth: "The more often ballots are recounted, especially by hand, the
more likely it is that human errors, like lost ballots and other risks,
will be introduced. This frustrates the very reason why we have moved from
hand counting to machine counting." -- Former Sec. of State James Baker,
speaking on behalf of the Bush campaign at a press briefing televised by
all networks on 11/10/00.

Fact: In 1997, George W. Bush signed into law a bill stating that hand
recounts were the preferred method in a close election in Texas. The bill,
"HB 330", mandated that representatives of all parties be present to prevent
fraud.

Laws establishing rights and procedures for hand recounts also exist in
Florida (see Title IX, Chapter 102). In fact, the Orlando Sentinel,
(orlandosentinel.com) reported that a partial hand count of Presidential
ballots this year was ordered by Republicans in Seminole County, where Bush
led Gore. This count took place on 11/9 and 11/10, widening Bush's lead by
98 votes. The Bush campaign did not complain about this hand count; nor
did it complain about the hand count on 11/11/00 which put Bush slightly
ahead of Gore in New Mexico.

There do exist machine voting systems which are fairly accurate, but
antiquated punch card systems are notoriously inaccurate. They were outlawed
in Massachusetts in 1997 by Secretary of State William Galvin after a
Congressional primary that was also "too close to call." The problem is
that if the punched-out pieces of cardboard are not completely removed from
the punch card, they can obstruct the card reader and the votes will not
be counted. A manual recount of such cards can clearly reveal the voter's
intentions.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

5) Myth: The process is unfair because hand recounts were held only in
liberal areas of Florida, where Gore stands to pick up the most votes.

Fact: It is true that a statewide recount would be more fair, and the Bush
campaign has every right to request one. According to Florida law, hand
recount requests must come from the campaigns, not from the state. To fail
to request what is commonly referred to as a "defensive recount" in
conservative areas of Florida, they may be making a tactical blunder that
will cost them the election.

It is also true that there were voting irregularities in the counties where
the Gore campaign requested recounts.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

6) Myth: "Palm Beach County is a Pat Buchanan stronghold and that's why
Pat Buchanan received 3407 votes there.

According to the Florida Department of State, 16,695 voters in Palm Beach
County are registered to the Independent Party, the Reform Party, or the
American Reform Party, an increase of 110% since the 1996 presidential
election" -- Ari Fleischer of the Bush Campaign, 11/9/00. The 2,000 votes
received by the Reform party candidate for Congress indicate that party's
strength in Palm Beach County (James Baker on Meet the Press, 11/12/00).

Fact: Of those 16,695 voters, only 337 (2 percent) are in the Reform Party
according to Florida state records. The Reform party candidate for Congress,
John McGuire, is connected to a more centrist wing of the Reform Party,
predating Buchanan's involvement. An analysis of his support indicates that
it came largely from reform-minded Ralph Nader voters.

Regarding Buchanan's vote total, the Washington Post reported that his vote
percentage in Palm Beach county was four times as high at the polls as in
absentee voting. Even Buchanan himself admitted on 11/8/00 on the Today
Show that many of his votes actually "belonged to Al Gore." So did his
campaign manager, Bay Buchanan.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

7) Myth: If Gore (or Bush) ends up winning the popular vote, he really
should win the election even if he loses Florida and other states.

Fact: This is not the way the U.S. Constitution is written. The Electoral
College decision, imperfect as it may be, is the only one that matters. It
may be possible to reform or eliminate the electoral college in the future,
so that small states would no longer receive extra electoral votes out of
proportion to their population. But until this change is made by
Constitutional amendment, the Electoral College is still the law of the
land.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

8) Myth: The Cook County, Illinois ballot from the home district of Gore
campaign chair Bill Daley is just like the "butterfly" ballot used in Palm
Beach County (reported by Don Evans, 11/8/00)

Fact: According to the Chicago Daily Herald on 11/10/00, the ballots in
Chicago which had "facing pages" were judicial retention questions which
only had two punch holes, Yes and No.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

9) Myth: The election process in Florida outside of Palm Beach County was
fair.

Fact: Actually, thousands of irregularities in over a half-dozen categories
have already been reported:

-Ballots ran out in certain precincts according to the LA Times on 11/10/00.

-Carpools of African-American voters were stopped by police, according to
the Los Angeles Times (11/10/00). In some cases, officers demanded to see
a "taxi license".

-Polls closed with people still in line in Tampa, according to the
Associated Press.

-In Osceola County, ballots did not line up properly, possibly causing Gore
voters to have their ballots cast for Harry Browne. Also, Hispanic voters
were required to produce two forms of ID when only one is required. (source:
Associated Press)

-Dozens, and possibly hundreds, of voters in Broward County were unable to
vote because the Supervisor of Elections did not have enough staff to verify
changes of address.

-Voters were mistakenly removed from voter rolls because their names were
similar to those of ex-cons. (source: Mother Jones magazine,
http://www.motherjones.com/news_wire/floridavote.html)

-According to Reuters news service (11/8/00), many voters received pencils
rather than pens when they voted, in violation of state law.

-According to the Miami Herald, many Haitian-American voters were turned
away from precincts where they were voting for the first time (11/10/00)

-According to Feed Magazine (www.feedmag.com), the mayoral candidate whose
election in Miami was overturned due to voter fraud, Xavier Suarez, said
he was involved in preparing absentee ballots for George W. Bush. (11/9/00,
reported at http://www.feedmag.com/templates/daily.php3?a_id=1389)

-According to tompaine.com, CBS's Dan Rather reported a possible computer
error in Volusia County, Florida, where James Harris, a Socialist Workers
Party candidate, won 9,888 votes. He won 583 in the rest of the state.
[11/9/00] County-level results for Florida are available at cnn.com.

-Many African-American first-time voters who registered at motor vehicles
offices or in campus voter registration drives did not appear on the voting
rolls, according to a hearing conducted by the NAACP and televised on C-SPAN
on 11/12/00.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

10) Myth: "No evidence of vote fraud, either in the original vote or in
the recount, has been presented." -- James Baker, representing the Bush
campaign on 11/10/00, in a Florida briefing.

Fact: The election was held just last week, so of course many instances of
fraud have not yet been substantiated. Even so, authorities have already
uncovered clear evidence of voter fraud involving absentee ballots.

In Pensacola, Florida, Bush supporter Todd Vinson never received the
absentee ballot he requested. According to the Associated Press on 11/9/00,
it was determined after an investigation that this ballot was received by
a third party, filled out with a forged signature, and then sent in.
Assistant State Attorney Russell Edgar, when asked if other absentee ballots
might had been intercepted, said, "I agree there may well be many more than
just this one."

Much media attention on the issue of voter fraud has been focused on
Wisconsin where cigarettes were offered to homeless people who were casting
absentee ballots, presumably for Gore. The Gore campaign claims the
cigarettes were not used to "buy" votes. The London Times has reported a
suspected pro-Bush vote fraud operation in Miami involving over thousands
of ballots (11/13/00).
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

11) Myth: It is highly unusual for judges to intervene after an election.
Since the designer of a disputed ballot in Florida is a member of the party
contesting the election, a legal challenge is impossible.

Fact: The most fundamental right of a democratic society is the right to
vote, and to have one's vote correctly counted. The legal system exists to
ensure that people's rights are not violated. Whether the person committing
a violation is a Democrat or a Republican does not affect how that violation
should be treated.

Elections are ultimately struggles for political power so it should not be
surprising that disputes are often resolved in court. Of course judges can
be biased. That is why they must explain their decisions and why bad
arguments can be overturned on appeal.

The Florida Supreme Court ruled in 1998, in connection with a disputed
Volusia County election, that if there is "substantial noncompliance" with
election laws and a "reasonable doubt" about whether election results
"expressed the will of the voters" then a judge must "void the contested
election, even in the absence of fraud or intentional wrongdoing." (source:
Wall St. Journal, 10/10/00). The Journal indicated that there was little
l egal precedent for revoting in just one area where an election occurred.
It would be more likely for a court to order a new election or to overturn
the result.

These issues have arisen in other states as well. In a Massachusetts
Democratic primary in 1996 for the US House, the election was so close
after recounts that a judge had to make the final decision after examining
some of the ballots that were incompletely punched, to determine the
intention of the voter. The law clearly dictated that it was the will of
the voter that mattered, and the candidate who was behind, William Delahunt,
went on to win the final election. Call the Capitol Switchboard if you have
any doubts at 202-225-3121.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

12) Myth: Richard Nixon's party in 1960 did the honorable thing in not
contesting the results of the election.

Fact: According to a column in the Los Angeles Times, 11/10/00, "on Nov.
11, three days after the election, Thruston B. Morton, a Kentucky senator
and the Republican Party's national chairman, launched bids for recounts
or investigations in not just Illinois and Texas but also Delaware,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania
and South Carolina. A few days later, Robert H. Finch and Leonard W. Hall,
two Nixon intimates, sent agents to conduct what they called "field checks"
in eight of those 11 battlegrounds. In New Jersey, local Republicans
obtained court orders for recounts; Texans brought suit in federal court.
Illinois witnessed the most vigorous crusade. Nixon aide Peter Flanigan
encouraged the creation of a Chicago-area Nixon Recount Committee. As late
as Nov. 23, Republican National Committee general counsel H. Meade Alcorn
Jr. was still predicting Nixon would take Illinois." Recounts continued
into December, but did not succeed in overturning the result of the
election.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

13) Myth: "Governor Bush is still the winner, subject only to counting the
overseas ballots, which traditionally have favored the Republican
candidates" -- James Baker, Press Briefing, 11/10/00

Fact: The number of yet-to-be-counted overseas military ballots is likely
to be in the range of 500 to 2000, based on the 1996 election in which
there were 2,300 oversees absentee ballots overall, with roughly 60% of
them coming from people enlisted in the military. According to CNN
[11/10/00], the military overseas ballots that arrived before the election
were already counted.

The biggest difference from 1996 is that Clinton -- who avoided the draft
-- was running against Dole, a decorated military veteran.

In 2000 George W. Bush -- who avoided service in Vietnam and actually lost
flying privileges in the Texas Air National Guard -- is running against Al
Gore, a veteran who served in Vietnam.

It is just as possible that Gore will gain a few hundred votes from veterans
as the other way around. It is also possible that the Gore ticket will pick
up votes from Democratic diplomatic appointees, or temporary residents and
dual citizens of Israel.
               __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __   __

Rich Cowan was the founder of the Center for Campus Organizing from 1991
to 1996 and is currently the chair of the Organizers' Collaborative -
http://www.organizenow.net/

© 2000 Peter Langston