Fun_People Archive
22 Feb
also Re: Which Berlin?


Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 18:39:15 -0800
From: Peter Langston <psl>
To: Fun_People
Subject: also Re: Which Berlin?

Forwarded-by: eljefe@netcom.com (Jef Jaisun)

[Then there's my buddy Richard, who has a slightly different take. -Jef]

Subject: Re: Which Berlin? (fwd)

At 04:12 PM 2/21/96 -0800, you wrote:
>We're dancing to a faster pace
>Look out, here comes the master race...

As I stated in the Politics Pub on Chat!^3, I am 100% behind
Pat Buchanan as the Republican nominee.

Unlike your pal's "adult" friends, I never laughed off Reagan's
run for either the nomination or the presidency; I don't think
anyone would have who came within spitting distance of California 

during his reign of terror/boneheadedness as da Guv.

Buchanan is an entirely different story...He has *no* possibility
of capturing the White House in any America I can either envision or 

would continue to inhabit, unless Clinton is videotaped fucking a 

cocker spaniel in the Rose Garden. All that a full-bore run by 

Buchanan will accomplish is the unmasking of a metric buttload of 

thinly disguised reactionary dickheads, who up until now have kept 

their xenophobic, racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semitic heads 

down in fear of being intellectually horsewhipped by roving gangs 

of intelligent decent Americans.

Saddle up, pard...this is going to be a great ride!


prev [=] prev © 1996 Peter Langston []